Forum Widgets
Recent Discussions
Tenable Post-Quantum Cryptography Inventory Support
Summary The advent of quantum computing presents a significant threat to current cryptographic algorithms. Organizations worldwide are beginning the critical transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) resistant algorithms to ensure long-term data security. Government mandates, such as the U.S. National Security Memorandum 10 (NSM-10), outlines deadlines for PQC migration and specific actions agencies must take to migrate vulnerable systems. Our PQC support is designed to help customers inventory use of TLS and SSH quantum-resistant and vulnerable algorithms within their infrastructure using remote Nessus-based scans. Cipher Inventory and Reporting Post-Quantum Cipher Plugins Two remote-based scan informational reporting plugins for TLS and SSH protocols inform customers of their transition posture according to NIST Post-Quantum Encryption Standards. Services Using Post Quantum Cryptography: Reports on services equipped with at least one post-quantum cipher. It will specify which post-quantum ciphers were discovered, reporting by port and protocol. Services Not Using Post Quantum Cryptography: Reports on services that support no post-quantum ciphers. These plugins will be enabled by default and included in existing scans. Cryptographic Inventory Plugin Reporting To enable a JSON-based inventory of each target by service and cipher, enable through either a preference on your Advanced Network Scan or by running the Cryptographic Inventory scan template. These preferences will initially be supported in Nessus and Tenable Vulnerability Management. They are planned to be added to Tenable Security Center at a later date. Warning: Enabling this preference through the Advanced Network Scan is expected to increase the overall size of the plugin output per target and resulting Nessus database size. If you do not need to produce this inventory at all or on your regular scan cadence, it’s recommended to instead run the Cryptographic Inventory scan template to decrease the potential impact to your normal scan results. Options to Enable Inventory Reporting Advanced Scan Preference Post Quantum Cryptography Scan Template Cryptographic Inventory Plugin Details The plugin enabled with the preference or scan template is an information plugin called Target Cipher Inventory. Within the output of this plugin, you will find a JSON structure containing the TLS and SSH inventories for the scanned target. You can export this inventory based on plugin output using the Tenable API if needed. For TLS, the structure contains: Attribute Definition Encaps Protocol encapsulation employed such as TLSv1, TLSv2, TLSv3 Port Port used for TLS communication Curve Group Encryption method Ciphersuite Algorithm used to secure the TLS connection For SSH, the structure contains: Attribute Definition Proto Protocol of SSH Port Port used for SSH communication Name Algorithm used to secure the protocol Type Use of the named algorithm such as “message auth” Release Date Tenable Vulnerability Management and Tenable Nessus: December 8, 2025 Tenable Security Center: - December 8, 2025 for the informational plugins - Cryptographic Inventory scan template release to be determinedastranahan5 months agoProduct Team4.1KViews3likes4CommentsComponent Installs Require Paranoid Checks (DEPRECATED)
Update - March 4, 2026 After considering customer feedback, we. have decided to re-evaluate these changes and come up with a better way of handling Component installs. For the latest information, please refer to the new release highlight: Improvement: Handling Component Installs for Vulnerability Assessment Summary With this update, products that are deemed to be components of another application, will now require the scan to be run in paranoid mode to trigger generic vulnerability detection plugins. In this context, “generic vulnerability detection plugins” refers to plugins that cover advisories published by the component vendor (e.g., plugin ID 242325, SQLite < 3.50.2 Memory Corruption) rather than the operating system or “parent” application that distributes the component, either as a part of the operating system or a dependent tool of the parent application. Overview Tenable covers software that can be either installed as base level software, or be included as component software of a larger product installation. Base level software can be updated without any impact to the base product functionality. Component software is typically updated as part of the vendor update for the larger packaged product, and the individual components are not updatable. Non-paranoid scans will report base software vulnerabilities that are actionable. Paranoid scans will report on base software vulnerabilities as well component software vulnerabilities that are not actionable, but still package a potentially vulnerable version of the component. To enhance the accuracy of our vulnerability detection and provide users with greater control over scan results, we are implementing an update affecting how we flag vulnerabilities in software components. Our detection plugins for OpenSSL, Curl, LibCurl, Apache HTTPD, Apache Tomcat, SQLite, PHP, Python packages and Node.js modules can now identify when these packages are installed as components of another parent application (e.g., SQLite bundled with Trend Micro’s Deep Security Agent), rather than as standalone installs. Key Changes: Non-Paranoid Scans: Scans running in the default mode will no longer flag generic vulnerability detection plugins for these component installs. This is because vulnerabilities in components generally cannot be patched directly; users must wait for the parent application's vendor to issue an update. OS Vendor Advisories Unaffected: This change does not affect plugins for OS vendor security advisories that cover the same vulnerabilities (e.g., plugin ID 243452, RHEL 9 : sqlite (RHSA-2025:12522)). Paranoid Scans: For scans running in paranoid mode, generic vulnerability detection plugins will still trigger for component installs if the detected version is lower than the expected fixed version. Expected Impact: Customers running non-paranoid scans should anticipate seeing a reduction in potential vulnerability findings for OpenSSL, Curl, LibCurl, Apache HTTPD, Apache Tomcat, SQLite, PHP, Python packages and Node.js modules that are installed as components. Technical Details: The changes are entirely contained within two shared libraries, vcf.inc and vdf.inc, utilized by the affected plugins. This update impacts approximately 750 plugins specific to OpenSSL, Curl, LibCurl, Apache HTTPD, Apache Tomcat, and SQLite. Targeted Release Date: Friday, February 6, 20262KViews0likes15CommentsImprovement: Handling Component Installs for Vulnerability Assessment
Background On Friday, February 6, 2026, Tenable Research published a plugin update that changed the way component installs are assessed for vulnerabilities. Those changes are outlined in a previous release highlight: Component Installs Require Paranoid Checks, This update essentially reverts this change, while adding new functionality to allow users to choose whether or not they want component installs assessed for vulnerabilities. Component installs are no longer influenced by scan paranoia settings. What are “Component Installs”? Software components, such as applications or language modules/libraries, are installed and managed by a primary "parent" package or application. The crucial point is that these components often cannot be updated individually. Instead, their vulnerability assessment and upgrade are entirely dependent on an update of the parent package. For instance, the SQLite database component is installed as part of the Trend Micro Deep Security Agent and is updated only when the Agent itself is updated. Nessus uses several factors to determine if a detected product is a component, or a standalone installation, including: Was the product installed by a package manager? These products are not considered components, as they are managed by the package manager and not a “parent” application Is the component a “language library”, i.e. a library or module used by the interpreter of a programming language like Python or Node.js? These enumerated libraries are marked as components by default. Does the product reside in a directory that is recognized for installations that are not component-based? Changes By default, component installs are once again assessed for vulnerabilities, as was the case prior to the release of the aforementioned update. If users wish to turn this setting off, so that component installs will not be assessed by generic vulnerability detection plugins, they can do so via the newly created scan preference. The end result of this change should be that fewer “false positives”, i.e. reported vulnerabilities for components that are “owned” by another application, are shown in scan results. Components with vulnerabilities that cannot be addressed independently of the “parent” application will not show in scan results. However, some customers have expressed a desire to see these vulnerabilities in their scan results anyway, to ensure full awareness of the risk profile of every application in their environment. This is still possible through the updated scan configuration settings. To modify this setting in your scan policy, go to Settings > Assessment > Accuracy > Override Normal Accuracy > Assess component installs for potential vulnerabilities. This setting is ON (checkbox is ticked) by default, so users must enable the Override Normal Accuracy checkbox (which is OFF / unchecked by default) if they wish to disable the setting and ensure that component installs are not assessed by generic vulnerability detection plugins in this scan. Please note that this update makes no other changes to the existing paranoia logic, outside of what is described above. For now, “Managed”, “Managed by OS” and “Backported” installs are still controlled by the Show/Avoid potential false alarms radio button. How can I tell if the detected install is a component or not? In addition to the above, we have also updated the relevant detection plugins so they will show if the component flag is set or not. At present, this includes detection plugins for OpenSSL, Curl, LibCurl, Apache HTTPD, Apache Tomcat, SQLite, Python Packages, Node.js modules and, soon to follow, Ruby and Nuget libraries. Using plugin ID 174788, SQLite Detection (Windows), here is a before and after example of the expected plugin output. Before: After: Expected Impact With the new default setting in place, users should anticipate an increase in vulnerability findings for the products in scope, returning to a level similar to what was observed before the first update. If users do not wish to surface these additional potential vulnerabilities, they should disable the "Assess component installs for potential vulnerabilities” setting. If the new scan preference is disabled, the volume of findings will remain consistent with current levels, when scanning with normal accuracy (paranoia) settings. Affected Plugins 12288, global_settings.nasl (updated to support the new scan policy preference) Any plugin that operates downstream of those in the list below: SQLite: 174788 - sqlite_nix_installed.nasl 171077 - sqlite_win_installed.nasl OpenSSL: 168007 - openssl_nix_installed.nasl 168149 - openssl_win_installed.nasl Curl: 182774 - curl_nix_installed.nasl 171860 - curl_win_installed.nasl LibCurl: 182848 - libcurl_nix_installed.nasl Apache HTTPD: 141394 - apache_http_server_nix_installed.nasl 141262 - apache_httpd_win_installed.nasl Apache Tomcat: 130175 - apache_tomcat_nix_installed.nasl 130590 - tomcat_win_installed.nasl Python Packages: 164122 - python_packages_installed_nix.nasl 139241 - python_win_installed.nasl Node.js Modules: 178772 - nodejs_modules_linux_installed.nasl 179440 - nodejs_modules_mac_installed.nasl 200172 - nodejs_modules_win_installed.nasl Targeted Release Date Tenable Nessus and Vulnerability Management: Monday, March 9, 2026 (ETA 22:30 Eastern Standard Time) Tenable Security Center: Monday, March 16, 20261.7KViews4likes11CommentsNessus now has Windows LAPS Support
Summary: Nessus now has the ability to leverage accounts managed by Microsoft Windows LAPS. How LAPS works: Since LAPS managed accounts have their passwords rotated routinely, users cannot just directly provide the credentials in their Scan Policy. Before this change, users would instead have to make an additional privileged account on each LAPS enabled Host to provide to Nessus. Currently Nessus supports Entra LAPS allowing a scan to pull LAPS Managed Credentials from a customer’s remote Entra instance. Now, Nessus can do the same for Windows LAPS, allowing customers with local LAPS setups to gain the same benefits! Without Windows LAPS support, customers must make dedicated account for Nessus to use to scan targets Change: With this LAPS support change, during the startup phase of a scan, Nessus will reach out to a customer provided Domain Controller hosting an AD forest with LAPS enabled, and pull a list of all Local Admin Accounts for devices managed by LAPS. Nessus will then attempt to use these retrieved LAPS managed accounts as credentials when attempting to access a target host. With Windows LAPS Support, Customers need only provide a single Credential that allows Nessus to retrieve the actual credentials for LAPS Managed Devices How to enable it: To make use of Nessus’ Windows LAPS support, a customer needs only to provide the necessary info to their scan/policy via the Windows LAPS Credential. They’ll need to provide us the IP of the DC, Credentials for an account on that DC with the necessary permissions*, and the DistinguishedName of the OU that contains their LAPS managed devices. *The Account for retrieving Windows LAPS credentials needs the following permissions General Recommend the Account be added to the BUILTIN/Administrators AD Group as it grants all required permissions, including: Access to the $Admin Able to log on to the DC remotely Able to run Powershell WMI and DCOM access to Root/CIMV2 WMI Namespace LAPS Permissions LapsADReadPasswordPermission rights to the LAPS OU Be an Authorized Password Decryptor in the LAPS GPO (without this, Nessus will not be able to retrieve passwords protected by LAPS Encryption). Members of the Domain Administrators group are Authorized Password Decryptors by default. For additional information see: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/laps/laps-overview Impact: Customers using Rotating Host passwords managed through Microsoft Windows LAPS can now leverage these credentials in their Nessus scans for more secure scanning configurations. Target Release Date: Nessus, T.VM On/About 09 JUN 2025 T.SC TBD1.4KViews11likes5CommentsNessus now has Entra LAPS Support Summary: Nessus now has...
Nessus now has Entra LAPS Support Summary: Nessus now has the ability to leverage accounts managed by Microsoft Entra LAPS. How LAPS works: Since LAPS managed accounts have their passwords rotated routinely, users cannot just directly provide the credentials in their Scan Policy. Before this change, users would instead have to make an additional privileged account on each LAPS enabled Host to provide to Nessus. Now that Nessus can communicate with an Entra LAPS setup, customers no longer need to have or provide those extra privileged accounts. This means less exposure and less redundancy in a customer’s environment. Change: With this LAPS support change, during the startup phase of a scan, Nessus will reach out to a Microsoft Entra Tenant and pull a list of all Local Admin Accounts managed by LAPS. Nessus will then attempt to use these Entra provided LAPS managed accounts as credentials when attempting to access a target host. The LAPS credentials found are not stored or kept in the scanner configuration any way and only exist in memory at runtime. Each time a Scan is initiated with LAPS support enabled, it will do a fresh pull of credentials. How to enable it: To make use of Nessus’ Entra LAPS support, customers need a Registered App in their Entra Tenant with the DeviceLocalCredential.Read.All permission. These Registered App permissions are what allows an App to access the LAPS managed accounts. Customers with an existing Registered App can configure them for use in Nessus by simply granting the Registered App the DeviceLocalCredential.Read.All permission, allowing Nessus to access LAPS data. Customers without a Registered App will need to create a new one, and provide it as a [Cloud Services Microsoft Azure/Entra Credential] in your Scan Policy. For additional information see: https://docs.tenable.com/identity-exposure/3_x/Content/Admin/entra_id_support.htm#Configure-Microsoft-Entra-ID-settings and https://docs.tenable.com/vulnerability-management/Content/Settings/Credentials/CreateManagedCredential.htm Impact: Customers using Rotating Host passwords managed through Microsoft Entra LAPS can now leverage these credentials in their Nessus scans for more secure scanning configurations. Target Release Date: Immediateibelyna2 years agoNot applicable1.1KViews0likes0CommentsResearch Release Highlight - SSH Session Reuse
Summary Nessus scan will support an opt-in feature to reuse SSH sessions during a scan where possible when running Nessus versions 10.9.0 and greater. This update was made in response to numerous customer requests for reducing the number of new SSH connections established during remote network scans and the associated increase in network traffic. Change A new scan configuration template option will be available for customers to actively enable the [Reuse SSH connections] configuration in their scan policies in Advanced Settings under Advanced Performance Options. Customers can return to the classic SSH connection functionality by changing [Reuse SSH connections] to the default “off” setting in their scan policies. Customers must be running a version of Nessus 10.9.0 or greater that supports this feature and have a Plugin Feed that displays the scan configuration policy user interface and NASL plugin set with the SSH session reuse functionality. Impact Customers should see a significant decrease in the total number of SSH sessions established during a Nessus scan as well as a reduction in load on Enterprise authorization, access, and accounting (AAA) tooling such as RADIUS servers and other connection management services. There should be no difference in scan results between scans that leverage SSH Session Reuse and scans that do not. If customers experience any such issues, the feature can easily be toggled off to return SSH connections during scans to the classic connection functionality. Target Release Date January 15, 20261KViews5likes0CommentsOverview of Callbacks in Log4j Remote Detection Plugins The...
Overview of Callbacks in Log4j Remote Detection Plugins The following is an overview of callbacks in Tenable plugins for Log4Shell that perform remote detection 155998, 156014, 156016, 156017, 156035, 156056, 156115, 156132, 156157, 156158, 156162, 156166, 156197, 156232, 156256, 156257, 156258, 156375, 156445, 156559, and 156669. A HTTP request is sent by the scanner to the target being scanned with a benign payload containing a unique token. The target, if vulnerable, will act on the payload. Tenable tracks the target’s action on the payload via a callback to our hosted environment (plugins 156014, 156016, 156017, 156035, 156056, 156115, 156132, 156157, 156158, 156162, 156166,156197, 156232, 156256, 156257, 156258, 156375, 156445, 156559, and 156669) based on the unique token that was embedded in the initial request or via the LDAP connection callback to the scanner for plugin 155998. The callback is needed given the nature of the vulnerability as execution of the payload happens on the target being scanned. In plugin 155998, the callback happens to the scanner. This is the reason the plugin is not supported on Tenable.io cloud scanners In plugins 156014, 156016, 156017, 156035, 156056, 156115, 156132, 156157, 156158, 156162, 156166, 156197, 156232, 156256, 156257, 156258, 156375, 156445, 156559, and 156669 as part of execution of the payload, the target tries to resolve a domain owned by Tenable. While resolving the domain, Tenable is able to see the unique token that was sent in the initial request and thereby can track the callback. These plugins come with the major benefit that credentials are not required for scanning. However, the callbacks need to be successful for the plugin to be able to identify the exposure. Hence, communication between the target being scanned and the callback server must not be interrupted by intermediary devices. For more details: https://community.tenable.com/s/feed/0D53a00008E3hKzCAJ https://www.tenable.com/blog/cve-2021-44228-proof-of-concept-for-critical-apache-log4j-remote-code-execution-vulnerabilityibelyna4 years agoNot applicable950Views0likes13CommentsImproved Printer Fingerprinting
Summary This document addresses an issue where network printers generate unnecessary prints when scanned, even with the "Don't Scan Printers" setting enabled. The fix involves improving the SNMP identification process for printers by falling back to default community strings and ports if an incorrect community string is initially configured. Background Currently, if a customer configures an incorrect SNMP v1/v2(c) community string for a device, Plugin ID 11933 / "Do not scan printers" fails to revert to using well-known, default SNMP v1/v2(c) community strings and ports, unlike other plugins. This failure can prevent accurate identification of network printers, leading to them being scanned and in some cases, may inadvertently queue print jobs on printers Impact The following assumes the user has enabled the "Do not scan printers" setting in their scan policy and the network printer is correctly identified as such: Potential Decrease in Reported Vulnerabilities: Network printers will be less heavily scanned, potentially leading to a decrease in reported vulnerabilities related to these devices. Slight Increase in Packet Traffic: There will be an increase of approximately three packets per host as the system attempts fallback SNMP connections. Printers Marked as "Dead": Network printers that are successfully identified via SNMP will be marked as "dead" and will not be scanned further. This change aims to enhance the effectiveness of identifying network printers using SNMP, thereby reducing unnecessary and potentially damaging traffic directed at these devices. The resulting decrease in reported vulnerabilities is an expected outcome, as identified printers will no longer be subjected to heavy scanning. Users can continue to scan network printers by enabling the "Scan Network Printers" setting under “Host Discovery -> Fragile Devices -> Scan Network Printers” in the scan policy. This ensures that printers are scanned and not marked as dead, irrespective of fingerprinting. Affected Plugins 11933 ( "Do not scan printers") Affected Scan Policy Settings Discovery -> Host Discovery -> Fragile Devices -> Scan Network Printers Tenable Security Center Tenable Vulnerability Management Tenable Nessus Target Release Date: Monday, September 15, 2025678Views0likes2CommentsVulnerability Scanning Container Directory Exclusion Summary
Vulnerability Scanning Container Directory Exclusion Summary Directories that store container image layers will be excluded by default from vulnerability scanning for Tenable Vulnerability Management, Security Center and Nessus. The directories that will be excluded are those configured for container storage by the container management solution. Docker: The "Docker Root Dir:" as returned by the "docker info" command. This is /var/lib/docker by default. Podman: The "graphRoot:" as returned by the "podman system info" command. This defaults to /var/lib/containers/storage. containerd: The "root =" directory as returned by the "containerd config dump" and "containerd config default commands. This location is /var/lib/containers/storage by default. CRI-O: The "storage graph root:" as returned by running "crio status info". This location is /var/lib/containers/storage by default. What is the impact? Vulnerabilities previously detected as a result of scanning these directories will become mitigated on the next scan and findings not returned in future scans. These findings are a result of examining the container image layers on the filesystem. The container may not necessarily be running and represent risk to your organization and customers generally consider these results as false positives since they are managed Docker deployments. Tenable Cloud Security is designed to secure container images and provide pre-deployment validation. Recursively scanning these directories is a resource and time consuming process. The exclusion of the directories may also result in decreased scan times. Can I override the change? You could add an Include Filepath rule to your scan configuration in order to override the default exclusion behavior. This may be found under the Scan Policy Advanced Options. A note of caution that overriding the default behavior could affect scan performance or give results that are unable to be remediated since within a managed container. In order to include a directory that is automatically excluded, the user include filepath has to match the excluded directly exactly. Example: If your Docker configuration uses /var/lib/docker for container storage you would add /var/lib/docker to your user filepath inclusions. Adding a more or less specific location will have no effect. What are the affected plugins? At the time of this release highlight publication, the following plugins are leveraging find: 142023 - Apache Cassandra Installed (Linux) 133766 - Apache Maven Installed (Linux / Unix) 135172 - Oracle NoSQL Database Installed (Linux) 117706 - MagniComp SysInfo Installed (Linux/UNIX) 111679 - FasterXML Jackson Databind Detection for Linux/UNIX 112063 - Kubernetes Installed (Linux) 136340 - nginx Installed (Linux/UNIX) 131566 - Atlassian Jira Installed (Unix / Linux) 147817 - Java Detection and Identification (Linux / Unix) 132771 - Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR Installed (Unix / Linux) 132872 - Foxit Reader Installed (Linux) 174788 - SQLite Local Detection (Linux) 151883 - Libgcrypt Installed (Linux/UNIX) 99671 - Apache Struts Detection for Linux/UNIX 156000 - Apache Log4j Installed (Linux / Unix) 141394 - Apache HTTP Server Installed (Linux) 71642 - Oracle Installed Software Enumeration (Linux / Unix) 156551 - Oracle MySQL Enterprise Monitor Installed (macOS) 124276 - Oracle Tuxedo Installed (Linux/UNIX) 73913 - Oracle WebLogic Server Detection 133962 - Sophos Anti-Virus Installed (Linux) 186361 - VMWare Tools or Open VM Tools Installed (Linux) 187057 - OwnCloud OwnCloud Installed (Linux) 70349 - Adobe Acrobat Installed (Mac OS X) 72202 - JBoss Detection 147022 - SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise (ASE) Installed (Linux) 163488 - Terraform Configuration Detection for Linux/UNIX 77028 - IBM Installation Manager Detection (Linux / Unix) 145032 - IBM WebSphere eXtreme Scale (Linux) 144633 - IBM MQ Server and Client Installed (Linux) 136341 - Dell EMC Data Protection Central Installed (Linux) 133964 - SELinux Status Check 159273 - Dockerfile Detection for Linux/UNIX 174164 - Google Protobuf Go Module Installed (Linux/UNIX) 158567 - Citrix Workspace App Installed (nix) 55420 - Adobe Reader Installed (Mac OS X) Target Release Date April 30, 2025ibelyna1 year agoNot applicable674Views1like0CommentsTenable Research is providing the following supporting...
Tenable Research is providing the following supporting information about the 31 NASL detection plugins and two WAS plugin recently released in response to a critical vulnerability reported in Log4j (Log4Shell). As a reminder, it is recommended that thorough_tests are enabled for all scans using these CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45046, CVE-2021-4104, and CVE-2021-45105 plugins. NASL plugins 156183 Apache Log4j 2.x < 2.17.0 DoS Version check for known vuln Log4j versions related to CVE-2021-45105 in Windows, Unix and Linux systems 156057 Apache Log4j 2.x < 2.16.0 Version check for known vuln Log4j versions related to CVE-2021-45046 in Windows, Unix and Linux systems 156165 Apache Log4j 2.x < 2.16.0 RCE Version check for known vuln Log4j versions related to CVE-2021-45046 in MacOS systems 156164 Apache Log4Shell CVE-2021-45046 Bypass Remote Code Execution - (Direct Check HTTP) Direct Check compatible with Tenable.io Cloud Scanners and restrictive networks Delivers jndi:ldap crafted payloads including Session, JSession and PHPSession into the HTTP headers and then tracks the injection via DNS when the callback is made. Callback is needed given the nature of the vulnerability wherein the target / victim connects back to the host sending the original request and the host is vulnerable if the callback happens This plugin uses DNS (default port 53) for network communication. The following Apache Log4Shell CVE-2021-44228 Direct Checks share common techniques applied on different ports and protocols. They all share the following attributes: Direct Checks compatible with Tenable.io Cloud Scanners and restrictive networks Callback is needed given the nature of the vulnerability wherein the target / victim connects back to the host sending the original request and the host is vulnerable if the callback happens These plugins DNS (default port 53) for network communication. Delivers jndi:ldap crafted header script to select ports on a scan target and then tracks the injection via DNS when the callback is made CVE-2021-44228 direct check not requiring authentication 156669 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - MSRPC) 156559 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - RPCBIND) 156445 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - PPTP) 156375 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - UPnP) 156258 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - NTP) 156257 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - DNS) 156256 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - SNMP) 156232 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - SMB) 156197 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - NetBIOS) 156166 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - SSH) 156162 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - Telnet) 156158 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - IMAP) 156157 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - POP3) 156132 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - SMTP) 156115 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - FTP) 156056 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - any open port) 156035 VMware vCenter Log4Shell (Direct Check HTTP) Delivers jndi:ldap crafted payloads into the HTTP header of VMWare vCenter applications installed on the remote host on a scan target and then tracks the injection via DNS when the callback is made 156017 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check - SIP) 156016 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via Path Enumeration (Direct Check HTTP) 156014 Apache Log4Shell RCE detection via callback correlation (Direct Check HTTP) CVE-2021-44228 direct check not requiring authentication Direct Check compatible with Tenable.io Cloud Scanners and restrictive networks Injects payload into the HTTP headers and then tracks the injection via DNS when the callback is made Callback is needed given the nature of the vulnerability wherein the target / victim connects back to the host sending the original request and the host is vulnerable if the callback happens This plugin uses DNS (default port 53) for network communication. 155998 Apache Log4j Message Lookup Substitution RCE (Log4Shell) (Direct Check) CVE-2021-44228 direct check not requiring authentication Scanner sends jndi:ldap string to target and listens for LDAP BIND request from target It is not compatible with Tenable.io cloud scanners and may fail to return results in certain networks due to firewall rules or interference from other security devices. Callback is needed given the nature of the vulnerability wherein the target / victim connects back to the host sending the original request and the host is vulnerable if the callback happens This plugin uses ephemeral ports 50,000-60,000 for network communication 156001 Apache Log4j JAR Detection (Windows) Local Windows detection **recommend Thorough Tests** Checks running processes for Java instances running with Log4j in classpath and records the file paths Searches the file system for .jar files with known vuln Log4j filename matches (if thorough tests is enabled) 156000 Apache Log4j Installed (Unix) Local Linux detection Checks rpm packages for vulnerable Log4j matches (RedHat, Gentoo, SuSE, etc.) Search the file system paths for known vulnerable Log4j matches (if thorough tests is enabled) 155999 Apache Log4j < 2.15.0 Remote Code Execution Local Linux Detection (uses 156000) Version check for known vuln Log4j versions in Unix and Linux systems 156002 Apache Log4j < 2.15.0 Remote Code Execution Local Windows detection (uses 156001) Version check for known vuln Log4j versions in Windows systems 156032 EOL plugin for Log4j 1.x Apache Log4j version < 1.x End of Life / Unsupported Version Detection 156103 Apache Log4j 1.2 JMSAppender Remote Code Execution (CVE-2021-4104) The version of Apache Log4j on the remote host is 1.2. It is, therefore, affected by a remote code execution vulnerability when specifically configured to use JMSAppender. WAS plugins 113075- Apache Log4j Remote Code Execution (Log4Shell) CVE-2021-44228 direct check not requiring authentication Inject payload into the HTTP headers, POST/GET values, XML, JSON, cookies, etc. and then track the injection via DNS when the callback is made Callback is needed given the nature of the vulnerability wherein the target / victim connects back to the host sending the original request and the host is vulnerable if the callback happens 113076- Apache Log4j Remote Code Execution (Log4Shell) CVE-2021-44228 WAS Log4Shell file detection plugin Scan the web application directories for known vulnerable version of the Log4j installation file and flag the host if foundibelyna4 years agoNot applicable611Views0likes19Comments